Redesign AT&T × IBM iX · Internal tool

Redesigning ACTION, AT&T's device lookup portal.

I redesigned an existing internal portal that service engineers use to look up devices, sites and customers before they carry out work offline. Same data and features, rebuilt around finding the right device fast.

Client
AT&T · via IBM iX
Role
UI / UX Designer
Team
Solo
Project
Redesign · 10–12 days
Users
Service engineers

Context

A lookup tool that engineers use right before a job.

ACTION brings together device, site and customer data from several AT&T databases. Service engineers search it for a hostname, IP address or site, then take that information into work they carry out offline.

Who

Service engineers who need a specific device's details quickly and accurately.

When

Just before a task. Whatever they don't find now, they won't have in the field.

The brief

Redesign the ACTION home, search and results screens in 10–12 days, working solo.

Audit

Everything was on screen, so nothing stood out.

With no time for formal research, I started by auditing the existing ACTION v3.0 portal. Tap a marker to see each issue.

The original ACTION v3.0 home page
  1. 1Five colours, no hierarchy

    Each navigation tile and report group had its own saturated colour, so nothing signalled what mattered most.

  2. 2System noise up top

    A red build-version banner and admin links took the most prominent spot on the page.

  3. 3A 117-page list in a sidebar

    Customer reports sat in a narrow scrolling panel with its own pagination.

  4. 4Walls of underlined links

    Dozens of identical blue links, some opening external tools, with no way to tell them apart at a glance.

  5. 5Scroll inside scroll

    Nested scroll areas and "Next>>" pagination inside tiles hid half the tools.

Old Cisco EOX screen
Cisco EOXA tiny form floating in empty space.
Old ECDB lookup screen
ECDB lookupDense tables with no empty or loading states.
Old customer critical hubs screen
Customer critical hubsAn unsearchable dropdown of every customer.

Heuristic evaluation

Scoring the old portal against Nielsen's 10 heuristics.

I rated every heuristic on Nielsen's 0–4 severity scale, from cosmetic to catastrophic. The worst problems were structural, not visual polish. Select a row to see where it happens on the old screen.

1Catastrophic
2Major
5Minor
2Cosmetic
ACTION v3.0 · Home
Old ACTION home page Old Integrated lookup with the database dropdown open Old search results with the collapsed side panel Old ECDB lookup with an empty No Data table H08
Aesthetic & minimalist design
#HeuristicWhat I foundSeverity
H08Aesthetic & minimalist designFive saturated colour blocks, a news banner, a sidebar and six link groups compete on one screen.Catastrophic
H04Consistency & standardsEvery group has its own colour scheme. Internal and external links look identical, and link styles vary between panels.Major
H06Recognition rather than recallSearch types sit behind a dropdown and five tiles, so engineers must remember where each lookup lives.Major
H05Error preventionThe database dropdown lists 15+ sources with no default guidance, and hostnames have no example or validation.Minor
H01Visibility of system statusThe most prominent status on the page is a red build-version banner. Tables show "No Data" with no loading or empty states.Minor
H03User control & freedomRefining a search means reopening a collapsed side panel; there is no way to clear or reuse recent lookups.Minor
H07Flexibility & efficiency of useNo recent searches or shortcuts for repeat lookups; bookmarks are buried at the bottom of a scrolling sidebar.Minor
H09Help users recover from errorsEmpty results give no reason and no next step.Minor
H02Match with the real worldTerms like SIDBOR and NC3 suit expert engineers, but tile labels such as "Self service" are vague.Cosmetic
H10Help & documentationHelp is limited to an "About ACTION" link in the header.Cosmetic

Principles

Designing for the minute before the field.

Search first

The first thing on the page is the question engineers came to answer.

IDs you can read

Hostnames and serials in a monospaced face, so similar IDs don't blur together.

One accent

Blue means "act here". Everything else steps back.

Take it with you

Every result can be saved before the engineer goes offline.

UX laws

Six laws of UX, applied to real screens.

Each decision in the redesign traces back to a well-known principle of how people perceive and act.

Hick's law applied in the redesign

01

Hick's law

More choices, slower decisions.

In ACTIONTen search types and five tiles became four tabs plus "More types". The common lookups are one click, the rare ones stay reachable.

Fitts's law applied in the redesign

02

Fitts's law

Big, close targets are faster to hit.

In ACTIONA 56px search field with the Search button right beside it, instead of a small button below the form.

Miller's law applied in the redesign

03

Miller's law

People hold about 7 ± 2 items in mind.

In ACTIONGPS search's 12 loose fields are chunked into three groups of four: Location, Customer & site, and Asset & network.

Law of common region applied in the redesign

04

Law of common region

Things inside a shared boundary read as a group.

In ACTIONEach report group sits in its own card with a count, replacing colour-coded blocks that bled into one another.

Von Restorff effect applied in the redesign

05

Von Restorff effect

The one item that differs is the one remembered.

In ACTIONBlue is reserved for the primary action on every screen, so "Search" and "Save details" always stand out.

Tesler's law applied in the redesign

06

Tesler's law

Complexity has to live somewhere, so the system should carry it.

In ACTIONThe database defaults to "All (Auto)" with a note, so engineers no longer pick from 15+ sources.

Before & after

Same portal, same data, a clearer path to it.

The original ACTION v3.0 home page and my redesign, shown whole and side by side. Select either screen to see it full size.

Home page · old vs new

OldACTION v3.0
Old: the original ACTION v3.0 home page
  • Five coloured tiles compete for attention
  • Search type hidden in a dropdown
  • 60+ identical links in scrolling panels
NewACTION redesign
New: the redesigned ACTION home page
  • One navy bar, one blue accent
  • Search first, with the type as tabs
  • Recent searches and grouped reports

Or drag the slider to see the same screen change in place.

Original ACTION home page
Redesigned ACTION home page
BeforeAfter
Five coloured nav tiles
One navy bar and a search-first panel
Search type hidden in a dropdown
Search types as tabs, the rest one click away
Unexplained lock icons
"Search a customer to unlock 18 reports"
Duplicated, unlabelled links
Three clear columns, external tools marked

Screen by screen

Five parts of the portal, compared side by side.

Before
Navigation: original ACTION v3.0
After
Navigation: redesign
  • Build-version banner and admin links removed from the top
  • Five coloured tiles replaced by one navy bar
  • The page opens with the question the engineer came to answer

My redesign

Search, scan, save for the site visit.

The redesigned flow, from the first search to saving an asset's details before the engineer heads out.

One question up top, recent searches beside it, and customer reports that explain how to unlock them.

Redesigned home screen

Visual system

Quiet by default, blue where you act.

Navy#0E1A26 · chrome
Action blue#0057B8 · actions
Canvas#EEF2F6 · ground
Installed#1C7A45 · status
Slate#526173 · secondary text
Interface · IBM Plex Sans

What do you need to look up?

Chosen for its clarity at small sizes in dense tables.

Identifiers · IBM Plex Mono

GTADCSXONORL01R1

A fixed-width face keeps 0/O and 1/l apart in hostnames and serials.

Outcome

A calmer tool, built in under two weeks.

Search is the entry point

Every search type is visible and one click away, instead of hidden in a dropdown.

Less to scan

One accent colour, grouped reports and hidden empty columns cut the visual noise.

Ready for offline work

Results can be saved for the site visit, which is what engineers need the data for.

This redesign was a short solo engagement with no formal usability testing. The next step would be to watch engineers run their usual lookups on the new screens and measure time to find a device.